<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tobacco Manufacturers&#039; Association &#187; Display ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-tma.org.uk/category/display-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk</link>
	<description>Representing the UK tobacco sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Health Bill vote, House of Commons, 12 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/10/health-bill-vote-house-of-commons-12-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/10/health-bill-vote-house-of-commons-12-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This evening the House of Commons voted in favour of implementing a ban on the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This evening the House of Commons voted in favour of implementing a ban on  the display of tobacco products at the point of sale.</p>
<p>Christopher Ogden, Chief Executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association  (TMA) [1], said:</p>
<p>“This ban is unnecessary and unjustified. It is also unwanted by a  significant number of politicians from all parties [2] and by the retailers  whose businesses will be adversely affected to no purpose.</p>
<p>“The TMA believes legislation should be balanced, proportionate and  evidence-led. The Government has not presented any credible evidence to support  their stated objective that a ban would reduce youth smoking. A Populus survey  conducted on behalf of the TMA shows that 64% of people interviewed agreed that  a ban would not stop those under the legal age from starting to smoke [3].</p>
<p>“We are very disappointed that the Government has not taken into account  evidence provided by key stakeholders that a display ban would create serious  unintended consequences. For example, we believe that organised crime will  exploit the ban. The regulations will make it easier for rogue traders to hide  and sell illicit, unregulated tobacco products. According to the Populus survey  [3] 61% agree that a display would risk increasing the black market in  cigarettes. Early evidence from Ireland, where a display ban was imposed in July  2009, also bears this out.”</p>
<p>- ENDS -</p>
<p>For further information and/or interviews, please contact:</p>
<p>Dirk Vennix, TMA Director of Communications<br />
24 Hour Press Line: 020 7544  0111<br />
Mobile: 07872376748<br />
Email: dvennix@the-tma.org.uk</p>
<p>Notes to the Editor:</p>
<p>[1] The TMA is the trade association for tobacco companies that operate in  the UK. Our members are British American Tobacco UK Ltd (www.bat.com), Gallaher  Ltd (a member of the JTI Group of companies – www.jti.com), and Imperial Tobacco  Ltd. (UK). (www.imperial-tobacco.com)</p>
<p>[2] EDM 885, ‘Display of Tobacco Products’, February 2009</p>
<p>“That this House acknowledges the hard work of small and independent  retailers; congratulates them on the vital role they play in many diverse  communities across the country; recognises the ongoing economic and commercial  pressures threatening their viability and survival; is concerned that the  regulatory burden placed upon them should be maintained at an appropriate level;  expresses its concern that proposed measures to ban the display of tobacco  products in small shops are not balanced, proportionate or firmly  evidence-based; calls upon the Government to further consider the effects of the  measures on the viability of small shops and the market in illicit tobacco;  welcomes Government action to address illegal sales of tobacco; and urges the  Government to pursue the most effective and proven measures by which under-18  year olds can be deterred from smoking.“</p>
<p>http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=37964&#038;SESSION=899</p>
<p>[3] Populus conducted a survey of 1,001 adults in September 2009.</p>
<p>[4] The economic recession is likely to tempt more people to access cheaper  smuggled product from unscrupulous black market traders, who do not care who  they sell to and who do not ask for proof of age. There is also a danger that  the government proposal to ban the display of tobacco products in shops will  play into the hands of criminals trying to infiltrate the retail network.</p>
<p>[5] In 2006/7 the UK government estimated that up to 17% of cigarette and up  to 59% of hand rolling tobacco consumption was smuggled. The revenue lost due to  tobacco smuggling could be as much as £3.1 billion.</p>
<p>[6] TMA is fully committed to youth access prevention and agrees with the  Government that children should not smoke and should be actively discouraged  from doing so. The TMA is a principal stakeholder in CitizenCard  (www.citizencard.com), the UK’s leading proof-of-age scheme [1.8m cards issued]  and the No ID, No Sale (www.noidnosale.com) campaign operated by CitizenCard  which promotes all PASS accredited (Government approved) Proof of Age / ID  schemes. The NINS campaign has engaged over 130,000 retailers nationwide and  created a culture in which young people expect to be asked to prove their age,  and in which retailers accept only the correct ID. The key issue is that  retailers must be able to establish the age of any potential customer before a  sale is made. We fully support sanctions against those retailers who sell to  young people, and welcome stronger enforcement of the law to prevent underage  sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/10/health-bill-vote-house-of-commons-12-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Bill Report Stage vote, House of Lords, 6th May 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/05/health-bill-report-stage-vote-house-of-lords-6th-may-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/05/health-bill-report-stage-vote-house-of-lords-6th-may-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This evening the House of Lords voted in favour of implementing a ban on the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This evening the House of Lords voted in favour of implementing a ban on the  display of tobacco products at the point of sale.</p>
<p>Christopher Ogden, Chief Executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association  (TMA), said:</p>
<p>“This ban is unnecessary and unjustified.  It is also unwanted by a  significant number of politicians from all parties [1] and by the retailers  whose businesses will be adversely affected to no purpose.  There is no evidence  to support the government stated objective that a ban would reduce youth  smoking.</p>
<p>&#8220;We hope that common sense will prevail and the Bill will be amended when it  reaches the House of Commons.  The last thing retailers need in the midst of  recession is further regulation that will facilitate illicit trade and impact  adversely on thousands of small businesses and the communities they serve.”</p>
<div>Ends</div>
<div>For further information and/or interviews please contact:</div>
<div>Zöe Walker, Corporate Affairs Manager</div>
<p>t: 020 7544 0115  m: 07790 060041 e: zwalker@the-tma.org.uk</p>
<div><strong>Notes to Editors:</strong></div>
<p>1. The TMA is the trade association for the following tobacco companies that  operate in the UK: British American Tobacco UK Ltd (bat.com), Gallaher Ltd, a  member of JTI Group (JTI.com) and Imperial Tobacco Ltd.  (imperial-tobacco.com).</p>
<p><strong>2. TMA supports the retention of tobacco product displays and youth  access prevention</strong></p>
<p>•          The TMA completely agrees with the Government that children should  not smoke and should be actively discouraged from doing so.  The TMA is a  principal stakeholder in <strong>CitizenCard</strong> (<a href="http://www.citizencard.com/">www.citizencard.com</a>), the UK’s leading  proof-of-age scheme [1.9m cards issued] and the <strong>No ID, No Sale</strong> (<a href="http://www.noidnosale.com/">www.noidnosale.com</a>) campaign operated by  CitizenCard which promotes all PASS accredited (Government approved) Proof of  Age / ID schemes.</p>
<p>•          We fully support sanctions against those retailers who sell to  young people, and welcome stronger enforcement of the law to prevent underage  sales.</p>
<p>•          Displays allow adult consumers to <strong>make an informed  choice</strong> based on availability, price and brand from the wide range of  tobacco products on the market.</p>
<p>•          Tobacco is the <strong>most requested FMCG product in retail  outlets</strong>, with approximately 11million smokers in the UK regularly  buying tobacco products [2].</p>
<p>•          <strong>Concealing tobacco  products from view will: make it easier for traders of smuggled product to blend  it into the legal supply chain;</strong> will blur the distinction between the  legal and illegal market by virtue of it being out of sight; is <strong>likely  to increase counterfeiting;</strong> and, could increase the large illicit  tobacco market. Up to 17% of all cigarettes and 59% of handrolling tobacco  smoked in the UK already avoid duty resulting in a loss of up to £3.1 billion in  tax revenue to HM Treasury [3]. The ban will hinder the pro-active work  undertaken by TMA members, through their Memorandum of Understanding [4] with HM  Revenue and Customs (HMRC), to assist HMRC and Trading Standards in detecting  counterfeit tobacco products, as highlighted in the revised Tackling Tobacco  Smuggling document [5] and which has led to a reduction of smuggling of genuine  tobacco products.</p>
<p><strong>3. EDM 885, ‘Display of Tobacco Products’, February  2009 </strong></p>
<p>That this House acknowledges the hard work of small and independent  retailers; congratulates them on the vital role they play in many diverse  communities across the country; recognises the ongoing economic and commercial  pressures threatening their viability and survival; is concerned that the  regulatory burden placed upon them should be maintained at an appropriate level;  expresses its concern that proposed measures to ban the display of tobacco  products in small shops are not balanced, proportionate or firmly  evidence-based; calls upon the Government to further consider the effects of the  measures on the viability of small shops and the market in illicit tobacco;  welcomes Government action to address illegal sales of tobacco; and urges the  Government to pursue the most effective and proven measures by which under-18  year olds can be deterred from smoking. <a href="http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=37964&amp;SESSION=899">http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=37964&amp;SESSION=899</a></p>
<p>[1] EDM 885, February 2009</p>
<p><a id="OLE_LINK3" name="OLE_LINK3">[2]</a> General Household Survey plus  Continuous Household Survey (Northern Ireland) 2006</p>
<p>[3] Measuring Indirect Tax Gaps &#8211; 2008. HMRC, November 2008</p>
<p>[4] Memorandum of Understanding was signed between HMRC and TMA’s member  companies in 2006.</p>
<p>[5] Tackling Tobacco Smuggling Together Nov 2008 HMRC UKBA Chapter 1, 1.12  p2. announced in the Pre-Budget Report 24/11/08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/05/health-bill-report-stage-vote-house-of-lords-6th-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association continues to oppose a ban on tobacco display</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/01/tobacco-manufacturers%e2%80%99-association-continues-to-oppose-a-ban-on-tobacco-display/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/01/tobacco-manufacturers%e2%80%99-association-continues-to-oppose-a-ban-on-tobacco-display/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA) responded today to the publication of the Health Bill that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA) responded today to the publication of the Health Bill that contains measures to ban the display of tobacco products and to restrict vending machines.</p>
<p>Christopher Ogden, Chief Executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA), said:</p>
<p>“The TMA agrees with the government objective to reduce youth smoking but we continue to oppose a ban on tobacco display.  The Health Bill proposal is not supported by robust evidence, will not achieve the stated public health benefit and could have serious unintended consequences, such as disproportionately affecting small businesses and increasing illicit trade.</p>
<p>“Poor regulation is counterproductive and there are other initiatives open to the government that would reduce youth smoking including better enforcement of existing minimum age laws, support for proof-of-age campaigns such as ‘No ID, No Sale’, and tackling illicit trade.</p>
<p>“As the Health Bill makes its passage through Parliament we urge government to allow the tobacco provisions in the Bill to receive a proper debate and to ensure due account is taken of the widespread political and business opposition.  Over 100 MPs, including nearly 50 Labour MPs, signed Early Day Motion 1904 ‘Small Shops and Restrictions on Point of Sale Displays of Tobacco Products’ calling on the Government not to impose a ban on retailers who are worried that current economic pressures already threaten the survival of their businesses and want assurances that regulation will not be increased without sufficient evidence [see full text in Notes to Editors 4].</p>
<p>“Furthermore, Conservative and Liberal Democrat Shadow Health Ministers have publicly stated that they are against a ban and leading retailer bodies have voiced serious concerns about the potential impact on their members.”</p>
<p>- ENDS -</p>
<p>For further information please contact<br />
Zoe Walker, TMA Corporate Affairs Manager<br />
t: 020 7544 0115<br />
e: zwalker@the-tma.org.uk<br />
m: 07790 060041</p>
<p>Notes to Editors:</p>
<p>1. The TMA is the trade association for tobacco companies that operate in the UK.  Our members are British American Tobacco UK Ltd (bat.com), Gallaher Ltd, a member of JTI Group (JTI.com) and Imperial Tobacco Ltd. (imperial-tobacco.com).</p>
<p>2. Consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control (CFTC)</p>
<p>The TMA submission to the CFTC can be found on the TMA website: www.the-tma.org.uk.  The revised CFTC Report was published on 9 January 2009: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_091382 and the original CFTC Report was published on 9 December 2008.  The respondents were listed under Annex 1.  The Department of Health  (DH) omitted to name 89 organisations who responded in the original Report and had to issue a revised Report on 9 January following criticism.   The overall total is now 473 respondents, compared to the original total of 384, meaning 18% of respondents were not included originally by the DH.  In addition, there were tens of thousands of pre-written / postcard submissions, mainly from organisations funded by DH.</p>
<p>3. Tobacco product displays are not predictors of youth smoking. The DH itself stated in the CFTC that predictors of smoking are factors such as: age and sex, home environment, drug use, drinking alcohol, truancy and exclusion from school. It rightly does not list retail displays of tobacco products as a factor and states that the supportive evidence is not conclusive.</p>
<p>In Iceland and some Canadian provinces where product displays have been banned there has been no resulting reduction in smoking consumption. The TMA and its three member companies provided clear evidence from both Canada and Iceland [1] which shows that display bans have not impacted the consumption of cigarettes among young people. Yet nowhere does that evidence appear in the CFTC Report.  The Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey shows that removing point of sale display has indeed coincided with a fall in smoking prevalence rates amongst 15 to 19 year olds &#8211; from 22% in 2002 to 15% in 2007 although this is a decline of only 7%, not 10% as quoted by the Department of Health.  In addition, it is the figure for Canada as a whole, while the ban has not been imposed simultaneously across Canada as a whole, but on a province-by-province basis.  In Saskatchewan, which imposed a display ban in 2002 the decline was exactly the same, and in Manitoba which imposed a ban in 2004, the drop from 2004 to 2007 was only 1%, a lower decline than for Canada overall.</p>
<p>4. EDM 1904 ‘Small Shops and Restrictions on Point of Sale Displays of Tobacco Products’, November 2008</p>
<p>That this House acknowledges the hard work of small and independent retailers; congratulates them on the vital role they play in the many diverse communities across the country; recognises the ever-present economic and commercial pressures threatening their viability and survival and is concerned that the regulatory burden placed upon them should be maintained at an appropriate level; expresses its concern that any new measures to restrict the display of tobacco products in small shops should be balanced, proportionate and firmly evidence-based; and calls upon the Government to commit to open, full and genuine consultation with all affected and interested parties to examine the effect of any such proposals on the viability of small shops, the market in illicit tobacco and the impact on competition; further welcomes Government action to address illegal sales of tobacco; and urges the Government to continue to pursue the most effective and proven measures by which under-18s can be deterred from smoking. http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=36225&amp;SESSION=891</p>
<p>5. TMA is fully committed to youth access prevention</p>
<p>•The TMA completely agrees with the Government that children should not smoke and should be actively discouraged from doing so.  The TMA is a principal stakeholder in CitizenCard (www.citizencard.com), the UK’s leading proof-of-age scheme [1.8m cards issued] and the No ID, No Sale (www.noidnosale.com) campaign operated by CitizenCard which promotes all PASS accredited (Government approved) Proof of Age / ID schemes.<br />
•The key issue is that retailers must be able to establish the age of any potential customer before a sale is made.  We fully support sanctions against those retailers who sell to young people, and welcome stronger enforcement of the law to prevent underage sales.<br />
•The NINS campaign has engaged over 130,000 retailers nationwide and created a culture in which young people expect to be asked to prove their age, and in which retailers accept only the correct ID.<br />
6. TMA supports the retention of tobacco product displays at point of sale in shops</p>
<p>•Displays allow adult consumers to make an informed choice based on availability, price and brand from the wide range of tobacco products on the market.<br />
•Above the counter displays are necessary to keep products secure, speed up transaction times and reduce the need for extended verbal communication.<br />
•Tobacco is the most requested FMCG product in retail outlets, with approximately 11million smokers in the UK regularly buying tobacco products [2].<br />
•Concealing tobacco products from view will: make it easier for traders of smuggled product to blend it into the legal supply chain; will blur the distinction between the legal and illegal market by virtue of it being out of sight; is likely to increase counterfeiting; and, could increase the large illicit tobacco market. Up to 17% of all cigarettes and 59% of handrolling tobacco smoked in the UK already avoid duty resulting in a loss of up to £3.1 billion in tax revenue to HM Treasury [3]. The ban will hinder the pro-active work undertaken by TMA members, through their Memorandum of Understanding [4] with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), to assist HMRC and Trading Standards in detecting counterfeit tobacco products, as highlighted in the revised Tackling Tobacco Smuggling document [5] and which has led to a reduction of smuggling of genuine tobacco products.<br />
•Point of sale display is necessary for fair and undistorted competition between manufacturers and between retailers.<br />
7. TMA supports the continued use of tobacco vending machines with age-verification access</p>
<p>•Access to cigarette vending machines should be controlled in order to prevent sales to children and the National Association of Cigarette Machine Operators (NACMO) Code of Practice on the positioning of machines should be strictly adhered to.<br />
•The TMA believes that vending operators and manufacturers need to identify and utilize systems that enable the purchase of tobacco products by adults only.</p>
<p>[1] Statistics Iceland 2007. In Iceland where the ban was imposed the rate of decline in smoking has not increased<br />
[2] General Household Survey plus Continuous Household Survey (Northern Ireland) 200<br />
[3] Measuring Indirect Tax Gaps &#8211; 2008. HMRC, November 2008<br />
[4] Memorandum of Understanding was signed between HMRC and TMA’s member companies in 2006.<br />
[5] Tackling Tobacco Smuggling Together Nov 2008 HMRC UKBA Chapter 1, 1.12 p2. announced in the Pre-Budget Report 24/11/08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2009/01/tobacco-manufacturers%e2%80%99-association-continues-to-oppose-a-ban-on-tobacco-display/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banning the display of tobacco products is the wrong approach, says the TMA</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/12/banning-the-display-of-tobacco-products-is-the-wrong-approach-says-the-tma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/12/banning-the-display-of-tobacco-products-is-the-wrong-approach-says-the-tma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tobacco industry today reacted with disbelief to the news that the Government intends to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tobacco industry today reacted with disbelief to the news that the  Government intends to press ahead with a ban on the display of tobacco products,  despite widespread political and business opposition, and the lack of credible  evidence that a ban would reduce underage smoking.</p>
<p>Over one hundred MPs, including nearly 50 Labour MPs, signed an Early Day  Motion calling on the Government not to impose a ban on retailers without  sufficient evidence.  Conservative and Liberal Democrat Shadow Health Ministers  are also opposed to a ban.  In addition, leading retailer bodies across the  country expressed their opposition.</p>
<p>Chris Ogden, Chief Executive of the TMA, said:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The TMA is <strong>opposed to tobacco display bans which are not  supported by robust evidence, will not achieve the stated public health benefit  and will have serious unintended consequences.</strong></em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We want to help tackle underage smoking and there are plenty of  effective ways of doing so.  But, as we have reminded all those in Government, a  display ban is not one of them. It hasn’t worked in other countries and it won’t  work here.  In Iceland and Canada display bans have not reduced the consumption  of cigarettes.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;A ban on the display of products will also blur the distinction between  the legal and illegal market by virtue of it all being ‘out of sight’ and will  play into the hands of criminals trying to infiltrate the retail network.  Smuggling continues to account for up to 17% of cigarette and 59% of handrolling  tobacco consumption, resulting in a loss of up to £3.1 billion to HM Treasury.  The efforts of tobacco companies and HMR&amp;C have led to a reduction of  smuggling of genuine tobacco products but the display ban proposal is likely to  increase counterfeiting and illicit trade. Displays are necessary for fair and  undistorted competition between manufacturers and between retailers.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;There are more effective alternatives to prevent under 18s from  accessing cigarettes.  Proof of age schemes should be better supported, the law  on underage sales more strongly enforced and the government should crack down on  the illegal trade in tobacco. </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Adults who choose to smoke should have the right to buy tobacco, and  retailers the right to display and sell what is, after all, a legal product.  <strong>We welcome sensible proposals that will assist in preventing the sale of  tobacco to children under the age of 18, which are fair, balanced, proportionate  and above all, evidence-based.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<div>
<p><strong>- ENDS -</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>For further information please contact:<br />
Zoe Walker, TMA Corporate Affairs  Manager<br />
t: 020 7544 0115<br />
m: 07790 060041<br />
e:  zwalker@the-tma.org.uk</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>Notes to  Editors:</strong></p>
</div>
<p>1. The TMA is the trade association for tobacco companies that operate in the  UK. Our members are British American Tobacco UK Ltd (bat.com), Gallaher Ltd, a  member of JTI Group (JTI.com), and Imperial Tobacco Ltd.  (imperial-tobacco.com).</p>
<p>The TMA submission to the Consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control  (CFTC) can be found on the TMA website: www.the-tma.org.uk</p>
<p>2. Fully committed to youth access prevention</p>
<ul>
<li>The TMA completely agrees with the Government that children should not smoke  and should be actively discouraged from doing so.  The TMA is a principal  stakeholder in CitizenCard (www.citizencard.com), the UK’s leading proof-of-age  scheme [1.8m cards issued] and the No ID, No Sale (NINS) (www.noidnosale.com)  campaign operated by CitizenCard which promotes all PASS accredited (Government  approved) Proof of Age / ID schemes.</li>
<li>The key issue is that retailers must be able to establish the age of any  potential customer before a sale is made.  We fully support sanctions against  those retailers who sell to young people, and welcome stronger enforcement of  the law to prevent underage sales.</li>
<li>The NINS campaign has engaged over 130,000 retailers nationwide and created  a culture in which young people expect to be asked to prove their age, and in  which retailers accept only the correct ID.</li>
</ul>
<p>3. Support the retention of tobacco product displays at point of sale in  shops</p>
<ul>
<li>Displays allow adult consumers to make an informed choice based on  availability, price and brand from the wide range of tobacco products.</li>
<li>Above the counter displays are necessary as they keep products secure, speed  up transaction times and reduce the need for extended verbal communication.</li>
<li>Tobacco is the most requested Fast Moving Consumer Good (FMCG) product in  retail outlets, with approximately 11million smokers in the UK regularly buying  tobacco products . A display ban could increase the large illicit market in  tobacco, where 17% of all cigarettes and 59% of rolling tobacco smoked in the UK  already avoiding duty resulting in a loss of up to £3.1 billion in tax revenue  to HM Treasury</li>
<li>Concealing tobacco products from view will make it easier for traders of  smuggled product to blend it into the legal supply chain.</li>
</ul>
<p>4. Support the continued use of tobacco vending machines with  age-verification access</p>
<ul>
<li>Access to cigarette vending machines should be controlled in order to  prevent sales to children and the National Association of Cigarette Machine  Operators (NACMO) Code of Practice on the positioning of machines should be  strictly adhered to.</li>
<li>The TMA believes that vending operators and manufacturers need to identify  and utilize systems that enable the purchase of tobacco products by adults only.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/12/banning-the-display-of-tobacco-products-is-the-wrong-approach-says-the-tma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“It doesn’t work elsewhere, it won’t work here and doesn’t add up.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/09/%e2%80%9cit-doesn%e2%80%99t-work-elsewhere-it-won%e2%80%99t-work-here-and-doesn%e2%80%99t-add-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/09/%e2%80%9cit-doesn%e2%80%99t-work-elsewhere-it-won%e2%80%99t-work-here-and-doesn%e2%80%99t-add-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the Department of Health&#8217;s Consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control (CFTC),...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the Department of Health&#8217;s Consultation on the Future of  Tobacco Control (CFTC), which closes on 8 September, the Tobacco Manufacturers&#8217;  Association (TMA) is <strong>opposed to tobacco display bans which are not  supported by robust evidence, will not achieve the stated public health benefit  and will have serious unintended consequences</strong>.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Tobacco product displays are not predictors of youth  smoking</strong>. Indeed, the Department of Health itself states in the CFTC  that predictors of smoking are factors such as: age and sex, home environment,  drug use, drinking alcohol, truancy and exclusion from school. It rightly does  not list retail displays of tobacco products as a factor.</li>
<li>Where product displays have been banned, in Iceland and some Canadian  provinces, for example, there has been <strong>no resulting reduction in smoking  consumption</strong>.</li>
<li>Point of sale display is <strong>necessary for fair and undistorted  competition</strong> between manufacturers and between retailers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Christopher Ogden, Chief Executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association  (TMA), said:</p>
<p>“<em>There are other initiatives open to the government that would reduce  youth smoking such as reducing youth access to tobacco products through  enforcing minimum age laws and tackling illicit trade.</em></p>
<p><em>“A ban on the display of products will also blur the distinction between  the legal and illegal market by virtue of it all being ‘under the counter’. This  will hinder the operations being undertaken by HMRC and Trading Standards to  tackle counterfeiting and undermine the considerable investment made by TMA and  its member companies in pro-actively providing HMRC with effective tools to  prevent tobacco smuggling.</em></p>
<p>“<em>It does not make sense financially either. In today’s economic climate  and challenging circumstances for the average smoker, particularly in  disadvantaged areas, we are concerned that they will be tempted to buy more  illicit tobacco, with subsequent loss of taxation. This could increase the large  illicit market in tobacco, where over a quarter of all cigarettes and two thirds  of rolling tobacco smoked in the UK already avoid duty</em>. (1)</p>
<p>“While we welcome any sensible proposals that will assist in preventing the  sale of tobacco to children under the age of 18, any proposals should be  supported by credible evidence that they would address the government’s stated  objectives. “</p>
<h5><strong>- ENDS -</strong></h5>
<p><strong>Notes to  Editors:</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. The TMA is the trade association for tobacco companies that  operate in the UK. Our members are British American Tobacco UK Ltd (bat.com),  Gallaher Ltd (gallaher-group.com), and Imperial Tobacco Ltd.  (imperial-tobacco.com).</strong></p>
<p>The TMA made its submission to the CFTC which can be found <a href="http://www.the-tma.org.uk/document_detail.aspx?page_id=9&amp;document_id=30">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>2. Tobacco control legislation</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The raising of the age of sale for tobacco products from 16 to 18 years is  now UK-wide since 1<sup>st</sup> September 2008.</li>
<li>The restriction orders provided for under the Criminal Justice and  Immigration Act 2008 will not be brought into effect until April 2009, meaning  that after this date retailers who flout the minimum age law could have their  right to sell tobacco suspended.</li>
<li>No date has yet been announced for the bringing into effect of the  significant additional enforcement powers made available by the Regulatory  Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3. Fully committed to youth access prevention</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The TMA completely agrees with the Government that children should not smoke  and should be actively discouraged from doing so. The TMA is a principal  stakeholder in (<a href="http://www.citizencard.com/">CitizenCard</a>), the UK’s  leading proof-of-age scheme [1.8m cards issued] and the (<a href="http://www.noidnosale.com/">No ID No  Sale</a>) campaign operated by CitizenCard which promotes all PASS  accredited (Government approved) Proof of Age / ID schemes.</li>
<li>The key issue is that retailers must be able to establish the age of any  potential customer before a sale is made. We fully support sanctions against  those retailers who sell to young people, and welcome stronger enforcement of  the law to prevent underage sales.</li>
<li>The NINS campaign has engaged more than 130,000 retailers nationwide and  created a culture in which young people expect to be asked to prove their age,  and in which retailers accept only the correct ID.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4. Support the retention of tobacco product displays at point of sale  in shops</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Displays enable adult consumers to <strong>make an informed choice</strong> based on availability, price and brand from the wide range of tobacco  products.</li>
<li>Point of sale display is <strong>necessary for fair and undistorted  competition</strong> between manufacturers and between retailers.</li>
<li>Above the counter displays are necessary as they <strong>keep products  secure</strong>, speed up transaction times and reduce the need for extended  verbal communication.</li>
<li>Tobacco is the <strong>most requested FMCG product in retail  outlets</strong>, with approximately 11million smokers in the UK regularly  buying tobacco products. (2)</li>
<li><strong>Concealing tobacco products from view will make it easier for  traders of smuggled product to blend it into the legal supply chain</strong>.  The efforts of tobacco companies and HMR&amp;C have led to a reduction of  smuggling of genuine tobacco products but this display ban proposal is likely to  increase counterfeiting and illicit trade.</li>
</ul>
<p>(1) TMA estimates 2007</p>
<p>(2) General Household Survey plus Continuous Household Survey (Northern  Ireland) 2006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/09/%e2%80%9cit-doesn%e2%80%99t-work-elsewhere-it-won%e2%80%99t-work-here-and-doesn%e2%80%99t-add-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TMA response on government proposals to restrict tobacco sales</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/05/tma-response-on-government-proposals-to-restrict-tobacco-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/05/tma-response-on-government-proposals-to-restrict-tobacco-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco control (general)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In anticipation of the Government’s Cancer Reform Strategy (CRS) proposals to impose further restrictions on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In anticipation of the Government’s Cancer Reform Strategy (CRS) proposals to  impose further restrictions on the sale of tobacco the Tobacco Manufacturers’  Association (TMA) supports the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Prevention of those under the legal age of 18 years from accessing tobacco  products;</li>
<li>Retention of tobacco product displays at the point of sale in shops;</li>
<li>The continuation of the sale of 10-packs of cigarettes;</li>
<li>Continued use of tobacco vending machines with age-controlled  access.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>(The TMA’s key positions on the government’s proposals are given below in  the Notes to Editors)</em></p>
<p>Chris Ogden, Director of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA),  said:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The TMA completely agrees with the Government that children should not  smoke and should be actively discouraged from doing so. The vast majority of  retailers in England are committed to upholding the law on age-related sales and  we remain committed to retailer proof-of-age programmes such as ‘CitizenCard’  and ‘No ID, No Sale’ as the most effective way to stop children accessing  cigarettes. We fully support sanctions against those retailers who sell to young  people, and welcome stronger enforcement of the law to prevent underage  sales.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;While we welcome any sensible proposals that will assist in preventing  the sale of tobacco to children under the age of 18, any proposals should be  supported by credible evidence that they would address the government’s stated  objectives.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We believe that any regulatory proposals on tobacco sales must strike a  balance between pursuing public health policy objectives and allowing adults the  freedom of choice to smoke and the right of retailers to display and sell a  legal product. There is real concern from many stakeholders that some of the  proposed regulations, such as display restrictions and a ban on 10s packs of  cigarettes, could have serious unintended consequences, such as increasing an  already large illicit market in tobacco.&#8221;</em></p>
<h5><strong>- ENDS  -</strong></h5>
<p>Chris Ogden, TMA Director will be available for interviews on 30/31 May.</p>
<p><strong>For further information please contact:</strong></p>
<p>Dirk Vennix, Director of Communications<br />
t: 020 7544 0109<br />
m: 07872  376748<br />
e: dvennix@the-tma.org.uk</p>
<p><strong>Notes  to Editors:</strong></p>
<p>The TMA is the trade association for  tobacco companies that operate in the UK. Our members are British American  Tobacco UK Ltd (bat.com), Gallaher Ltd (gallaher-group.com), and Imperial  Tobacco Ltd. (imperial-tobacco.com).</p>
<p><strong>Key TMA  Positions:</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Fully committed to youth access  prevention</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The TMA is a principal stakeholder in  <strong>CitizenCard</strong> (citizencard.com), the UK’s leading proof-of-age  scheme [1.7m cards issued] and the <strong>No ID, No Sale</strong> (NINS:  noidnosale.com) campaign operated by CitizenCard which promotes all PASS  accredited (Government approved) Proof of Age / ID schemes. The key issue is  that retailers must be able to establish the age of any potential customer  before a sale is made.</li>
<li>The NINS campaign has engaged more than  100,000 retailers nationwide and created a culture in which young people expect  to be asked to prove their age, and in which retailers accept only the correct  ID.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2. Support the retention of  tobacco product displays at point of sale in shops</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Displays enable adult consumers to  <strong>make an informed choice</strong> based on availability, price and brand  from the wide range of tobacco products.</li>
<li>Point of sale display is  <strong>necessary for fair and undistorted competition</strong> between  manufacturers and between retailers.</li>
<li>Above the counter displays are necessary  as they <strong>keep products secure</strong>, speed up transaction times and  reduce the need for extended verbal communication.</li>
<li>Tobacco is the <strong>most requested  FMCG product in retail outlets</strong>, with approximately 11million smokers in  the UK regularly buying tobacco products. <sup>[i]</sup></li>
<li><strong>Concealing tobacco products from  view will make it easier for traders of smuggled product to blend it into the  legal supply chain</strong>. The  efforts of tobacco companies and HMR&amp;C have led to a reduction of smuggling  of genuine tobacco products but this proposal will is likely to increase  counterfeiting and illicit trade.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3.</strong> <strong>The continuation of the sale of 10-packs  of cigarettes</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>10-packs provide adult consumers with  <strong>choice</strong> and are primarily purchased by <strong>adult smokers who  wish to control their daily consumption</strong>.</li>
<li>Within the UK, <strong>2.5million people  (20% of consumers) buy 10-packs.</strong> <sup>[ii]</sup></li>
<li>A ban is likely to encourage more  low-income smokers <strong>to seek cheaper, smuggled 20 packs</strong> (both  genuine and counterfeit) from illegal sellers who do not demand proof of age.  Estimates show 27% of cigarettes and 68% of hand rolling tobacco consumed in the  UK during 2007 were non-UK duty paid. Around 10% of this was counterfeit. Given  the prevalence and availability of smuggled and counterfeit product in the UK  <sup>[iii]</sup> the TMA believes that it would be particularly unwise to  prohibit 10-packs.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4. Support the continued use of  tobacco vending machines with age-verification access</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The TMA does not support the prohibition  of vending machines, which would not only <strong>prevent legitimate access by  adult smokers</strong>, but also <strong>force the closure of many small  businesses with consequent job losses</strong>.</li>
<li>Access to cigarette vending machines  should be controlled in order to prevent sales to children and the National  Association of Cigarette Machine Operators (NACMO) <strong>Code of  Practice</strong> on the positioning of machines should be strictly adhered  to.</li>
<li>The TMA believes that vending operators  and manufacturers need to identify and utilize systems that enable the purchase  of tobacco products by adults only.</li>
</ul>
<div>
<p><strong>Footnotes:</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<div id="edn1">
<p><sup>[i]</sup> General Household Survey plus Continuous Household  Survey (Northern Ireland) 2006</p>
</div>
<div id="edn2">
<p><sup>[ii]</sup> RAL data in “Category Review  2007”</p>
</div>
<div id="edn3">
<p><sup>[iii]</sup> HMRC estimate in 2005/06 NUKDP consumption lost  them revenue of between £2.8 billion and £4.3 billion</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2008/05/tma-response-on-government-proposals-to-restrict-tobacco-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to judgment in the judicial review of the POS Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/05/response-to-judgment-in-the-judicial-review-of-the-pos-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/05/response-to-judgment-in-the-judicial-review-of-the-pos-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 08:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court today rejected a judicial review brought by a number of tobacco companies...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The High Court today  rejected a judicial review brought by a number of tobacco companies of the  Tobacco Advertising and Promotion (Point of Sale) Regulations 2004, which are  due to come into force on 21 December 2004.</p>
<p>The companies had applied for  a judicial review of the POS Regulations because they believe the Regulations  will prevent meaningful or effective communication, which would provide smokers  with a reasonable level of information about the products before they buy and  will inhibit competition in the market, particularly from foreign  manufacturers.</p>
<p>Announcing his decision Mr Justice McCombe said he had  rejected the claimants’ application on the grounds that the Secretary of State  for Health was entitled to a wide discretion in deciding how best to meet the  public health objective and that, taken in the context of the wider scheme of  advertising restrictions, the POS Regulations were not disproportionate to that  objective.</p>
<p>Tim Lord, Chief Executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers’  Association (TMA), the majority of whose members were party to the action, said  that a decision on whether to continue with an appeal will be made in due  course.</p>
<p>Mr Lord said “We remain very concerned that these Regulations  will prevent smokers from receiving a reasonable level of information about  products. However, the companies will work closely with retailers to implement  the Regulations by the date set.”</p>
<p>Ends</p>
<p>Notes to  editors:</p>
<p>This press release represents the views of our principal members  who are Imperial Tobacco, Gallaher Tobacco and British American  Tobacco.</p>
<p>Contact:<br />
TMA<br />
Mrs Gill Silverman<br />
e  gsilverman@the-tma.org.uk<br />
t 020 7544 0108 Bottom of Form</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/05/response-to-judgment-in-the-judicial-review-of-the-pos-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tobacco Companies Challenge Point of Sale Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/04/tobacco-companies-challenge-point-of-sale-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/04/tobacco-companies-challenge-point-of-sale-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six tobacco companies, including members of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA), today applied to the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six tobacco companies,  including members of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association (TMA), today applied  to the High Court for Judicial Review of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion  (Point of Sale) Regulations 2004, which were laid before Parliament on the 18th  March 2004.</p>
<p>The companies claim that the Regulations prevent any form of  meaningful or effective communication with adult smokers and will not allow  smokers to receive a reasonable level of information about the products before  they buy.</p>
<p>Tim Lord, chief executive of the TMA, said: “We consider that  the Regulations are disproportionate and illegal. They contain unreasonable  restrictions on providing information at the point of sale and will inhibit  competition. Regrettably, our attempts to resolve the matter through dialogue  with the Department of Health have come to nothing, so we have no option but to  resort to legal action.”</p>
<p>The companies participating in the legal action  are:</p>
<p>BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (UK) LIMITED<br />
GALLAHER  LIMITED<br />
IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED<br />
PHILIP MORRIS LIMITED<br />
SOCIÉTÉ  NATIONALE D’EXPLOITATION INDUSTRIELLE DES TABAC ET ALLUMETTES  (“SEITA”)<br />
CHERWELL TOBACCO LIMITED</p>
<p>Notes:</p>
<p>1. The Regulations  restrict advertising of tobacco products at point of sale to one advertisement  per retail outlet that does not exceed the size of an A5 sheet of paper, of  which 30 per cent must be a health warning surrounded by a black border of  between 3 mm and 4 mm. The advertisement would have to be attached to a gantry  or other fixed display unit. The restrictions apply regardless of how many  gantries or display units are located on the premises. There are also  substantial limitations on content of the advertisement.</p>
<p>2. The main  grounds of the companies’ legal challenge are that the regulations violate their  freedom of commercial speech by virtue of the restrictions imposed and create  obstacles to trade between Member States because in practice they will favour UK  producers and incumbent UK and international brands.</p>
<p>3. British American  Tobacco (UK) Limited, Gallaher Limited and Imperial Tobacco Limited are  principal members of the TMA. Philip Morris Limited is an associate member of  the TMA.</p>
<p>4. SEITA is a large manufacturer of tobacco products in Member  States such as France and Spain whose products are sold in the UK.</p>
<p>5.  Cherwell Tobacco is the second largest vending machine operator in the UK. The  strict regulations on point of sale will affect vending machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/04/tobacco-companies-challenge-point-of-sale-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Point of Sale Regulations are Disproportionate</title>
		<link>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/03/point-of-sale-regulations-are-disproportionate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/03/point-of-sale-regulations-are-disproportionate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-tma.org.uk/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Government has laid before parliament the regulations relating to Point of Sale (POS)...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Government has laid before  parliament the regulations relating to Point of Sale (POS)  advertising.</p>
<p>The draft regulations permit static, single or multiple  advertisements, measuring in total no more than A5 in size, of which 30 per cent  must be a health warning. Only one advertisement per outlet is allowed,  regardless of how many gantries or display units are located on the  premises.</p>
<p>Tim Lord said: â€œWe are surprised and disappointed at the  degree of restrictions, which are disproportionate and inconsistent with the  consultation process. They prevent any form of meaningful or effective  communication with customers.</p>
<p>The Regulations take no proper account of  the vast differences between the various types of retail outlets which sell  tobacco products, and the way in which these products are  displayed.</p>
<p>Furthermore, they are so restrictive that, given the number of  different tobacco products on sale, they will stifle competition between the  different manufacturers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-tma.org.uk/2004/03/point-of-sale-regulations-are-disproportionate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

